All evidences indicate that it was Allah’s will that ‘Ali’s guardianship be the trial for the Muslims, as it was the reason behind every dispute and controversy erupted. And since Allah is subtile toward His bondmen, never taking the latters to task for what the earliers did, therefore He made His wisdom apparent and encompassed that incident (of Ghadir Khumm) with other splendid miracles-like events, so as to be an incentive for the Ummah, and the contemporary people would convey them and the followers would take an example of them, hoping that they might be guided to truth through searching and investigation.
-First Evidence
It is related to punishing whoever denying ‘Ali’s
guardianship, after the prevalence of the news of Ghadir Khumm, and designation
of al-’Imām ‘Ali as a caliph over the Muslims, with the Messenger’s
telling the people: The attendant should inform the absent.
When this news reached al-Hārith ibn al-Nu‘mān
al-Fahri, it displeased him.[160] So he rushed toward the Messenger of Allah,
made his camel kneel down before the Mosque door, and entered upon the Prophet
(S). After saluting him, he said: O Muåammad!
You ordered us to witness that no god is there but Allah and you are the
Messenger of Allah, and we accepted this from you. You also commanded us to
perform five prayers day and night, fast the Month of Ramadān, perform
pilgrimage to Allah’s House, and pay the alms-due out of our money and
properties and so we did. But you were not satisfied with all this, till you
one day surprised us with raising the hand of your cousin; preferring him over
other people, and said: "Of whomever I am a master, ‘Ali also is his
master." Is this from you or ordained by Allah?
The Messenger of Allah (S), whose eyes turned red, replied:
By Allah, Who no god is there but He. It is ordained by Allah, and not from me
(repeating it three times)
On standing up, al-Hārith said: "O Allah, if
what is uttered by Muåammad being true, send
against us stones from the sky or bring us a painful doom."
Then he (S) said: By Allah, before reaching his camel, Allah
pelted him with a stone from the heaven, which fell upon the top of his head
and went out from his posterior, causing his death. Thereat these verses were
revealed by Allah the Almighty: "Demanded, a demander, the
chastisement inevitable. For, the disbelievers against it, there is no
repeller." (70:1-2)
This episode is reported by a large number of Ahl al-Sunnah ‘ulamā’, other
than those we referred to.[161] Whoever desires to go through more references,
can refer to the book al-Ghadir of al-‘Allāmah al-’Amini.
-Second Evidence
It is related to the punishment of anyone concealing the
witness regarding the incident of al-Ghadir, and was inflicted by the
imprecation uttered by al-’Imām ‘Ali. That was when al-’Imām ‘Ali,
during a memorable day, rose up, and gathered people at al-Rahabah, proclaiming
from over the minbar: I appeal to every Muslim who heard the Messenger
of Allah (S), saying on the day of Ghadir Khumm. "‘Ali is the master of
whomever I am his master", to stand up and give witness of what he heard,
provided that he saw him by his own eyes and heard him by his own ears."
Thereat thirty Companions, among whom sixteen Badrites (those
who attended Battle of Badr), stood up and witnessed that he(S) took him by
hand and addressed people, saying: "Do you know that I have more
authority over the believers than they have over themselves? They said: Yes,
you do. He said: Of whomever I am his master, this one (‘Ali) is also his
master. O Allah, befriend whoever befriends him, and be the enemy of his
enemy..."
But jealousy and hatred harboured inside the hearts of some
Companions who attended the Incident of al-Ghadir, withheld them from standing
and giving witness. Among them being Anas ibn Mālik, toward whom
al-’Imām ‘Ali descended the minbar (pulpit) and said to him: O
Anas, what is the matter with you? Why don’t you rise up together with the
Messenger’s Companions and give witness of what you heard on that day as they
did? He replied: O Amir al-Mu’minin! I became old and forgot (that incident).
Then al-’Imām ‘Ali said: If you are proved to be a liar I invoke Allah to
afflict you with leprosy in a way that no turban can cover. Then as soon as he
stood up, his face turned white out of leprosy, after which he began to lament
himself, weeping and saying: I am inflicted with the curse of the upright man
because I concealed the witness to his benefit.
This episode is widely known, and was reported by Ibn Qutaybah
in the book al-Ma‘ārif,[162] in which he counted Anas among the cripple
persons under bāb al-baras (leprosy), and also by al-Imam Aåmad ibn Hanbal in his
Musnad,[163]when he said: They all stood up except three, who didn’t
rise up, so they were afflicted with his imprecation.
It is noteworthy to mention here that these three men were
referred to by al-’Imām Aåmad
as reported by al-Baladhuri,[164] when saying: After citing
al-’Imām ‘Ali’s appeal to witness, Anas ibn Mālik, al-Barā’ ibn
‘Azib and Jarir ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Bajali were sitting near the pulpit.
Al-’Imām repeated his appeal, but received no response from any of them,
whereat he(‘a) said: My Lord, whoever hides this witness while knowing it. You
should never let him die and leave the world without branding him with a sign
distinguishing him for all people. After that, Anas ibn Mālik was affected
with leprosy, al-Barā’ ibn ‘Azib turned blind, and Jarir was converted to
a bedouin after his migration, and on coming al-Shurāt he died inside his
mother’s house.
This story is famous, reported by a large number of historians.[165]
“So Learn a Lesson, O ye who have eyes.”
Any truth-seeker can recognize, out of this incident,[166] that was revived by
al-’Imām ‘Ali after elapse of twenty-five years and was about to be
obliterated, the real value, greatness, sublimity and self serenity of
al-’Imām ‘Ali (‘a). While he showed extreme forbearance, being true
counseller to Abu Bakr, ‘Umar and ‘Uthmān as long as knowing that advising
them being for the interest of Islam and Muslims, nevertheless he kept on
holding in mind the Incident of al-Ghadir with all its denotations, besides its
being remembered in his conscience throughout all of his life moments. As soon
as finding an opportune time to resurrecting and reviving it, he would
immediately embark on compelling others to give witness with it publicly and
before all people.
Anyone can contemplate in the way of reviving this blessed
memory and its implied extreme wisdom for establishing the proof against all
Muslims, whether those attended the incident and others. If al-’Imām said:
"O people, the Messenger of Allah has committed caliphate to me at Ghadir
Khumm", this wouldn’t have that influence and impression upon the hearts
and minds of the attendants, and they would have surely disputed with him due
to the silence he kept throughout all that period.
But when he said: I appeal to every Muslim, who heard
what the Messenger of Allah (S) declared on the day of Ghadir Khumm, to stand
up and give witness, so as to make the incident reported through a tradition
from the Messenger of Allah (S), by thirty Companions among whom were sixteen
men attending Badr (Battle). In this way al-’Imām closed the door before
the deniers and skeptics, and those protesting against his keeping silence all
that period, since keeping silence by these thirty men, who being the magnates
among the shaābah, would be a strong evidence indicating the perilousness
of the situation, and that silence implying the interest of Islam as known by
all.
A Comment about Shurā
Out of what is mentioned, it became clear for us that caliphate, in the
perspective of the Shi‘ah, being according to Allah’s will and choice, and
determination by the Messenger of Allah (S) through a revelation revealed to
him. this claim is quitely in line with the philosophy of Islam in all its
rulings and legislations, as Allah, the Glorified, is He Who "...createth
whatever He willeth and (also) chooseth too; it is not theirs to
choose."...(28:68)
And since Allah, the Glorified, willed that the Ummah of Muhammad to be the
best community that has been raised up for mankind, so it should have a leader
who being wise, sagacious, knowledgeable, powerful, valiant, pious, ascetic,
and having the highest level of faith. All these traits can never be enjoyed
but by that who being chosen by Allah, the Glorious and the Mighty,
distinguishing him with special characteristics qualifying him for the post of
leadership and headship. The Almighty Allah said: "Allah chooseth from the
angels messengers, and (also) from mankind. Lo! Allah is Hearer, Seer."
(22:75)
The executors have been chosen by Allah exactly as in the case
of the prophets. The Messenger of Allah (S) said in this respect:
"For every prophet there is an executor (wasi), and my executor is ‘Ali
ibn Abi Tālib.[167]
In another haadith, he (S) said: “I am the seal of the
prophets and ‘Ali is the seal of the executors.” 168[168]
On this basis, the Shi‘ah submitted totally to Allah and His
Messenger, with no one left among them claiming caliphate for himself or
covetting to it, neither through text (nass) nor through election:
first, because the nass negates the election and shurā (council), and
secondly due to the fact that the nass was made by the Messenger of Allah (may Allah’s
peace and benediction be upon him and his Progeny) upon particular and specific
persons[169] by their names, so as no transgressor could lift a hand against
it, and otherwise he would be considered a debauchee and an apostate.
While caliphate in the perspective of Ahl al-Sunnah being through election
(ikhtiyār) and council (shurā). In this way they opened a door that
couldn’t be closed before anyone, arousing the greediness of all, far and near,
and bad and good for it, till it was handed over from Quraysh to the
mawāli and slaves, then to the Mamalik and lastly to the Turkish and
Moguls.
Thereat, all the values and conditions they stipulated to be possessed by the
caliph, have been neglected since anyone other than the Infallible was merely a
human being full of passions and instincts, who as soon as attaining to power,
feels uncertain of being converted and turned to be worse than he was. And the
Islamic history is replete with many evidences confirming our claim.
Some readers may think that I am exaggerating, and I ask them to go through the
history of the Umayyads with the ‘Abbāsids and others, to realize that who
called himself ‘Amir al-Mu’minin’ used to show openly the habit of imbibing
wine, frolic with the apes, clothing them with gold. And that the so-called
(Amir al-Mu’minin) used to clothe his bondmaid his clothes to lead Muslims in
prayers, turning mad due to the death of his slave-girl Habbabah, being
delighted at a poet whereat he kisses his penis. Why do we occupy our minds in
talking about those whom the Muslims judged to be representing only the
mordacious kings, not the (real) caliphate, as referred to by the åhadith narrated by them, which is the utterance of
the Messenger (S).
"Verily successorship after me shall last for thirty years, after which it
will be only a mordacious rule."
This point is out of scope of our discussion, and anyone desiring to have
information about that is asked to refer to Ta’rikh al-Tabari, Ta’rikh Ibn
al-’Athir, Ta’rikh Abi al-Fidā’ and Ta’rikh Ibn Qutaybah, and others.
That which I intended to say was to demonstrate the disadvantages of election,
and futility of the theory from its foundation, as against the one whom we
elect today we may harbour malice, and it, will be manifested for us that we
were mistaken and have gone wrong in election. This is exactly like the case of
‘Abd al-Raåmān ibn ‘Awf when he chose
‘Uthmān ibn ‘Affān for the post of caliphate, after which he felt so
regretful, but that was of no use for the ‘Ummah after putting it in trouble.
When a reputable Companion belonging to the first vanguard like ‘Uthmān,
breaches the covenant he gave to ‘Abd al-Raåmān
ibn ‘Awf, and when the latter, though being a companion of fame among the
predecessors, being unable to choose properly, it would be impossible then to
any sane man to be satisfied with this barren theory that produced nothing but
turmoil, instability and bloodshed. And while swearing allegiance to Abu Bakr
being a slip Allah protected Muslims against its evil, as described by ‘Umar
ibn al-Khattāb, with a large number of Companions opposing and renouncing
it, and when allegiance to ‘Ali ibn Abi Tālib being sworn publicly with
presence of some Companions violating the allegiance, leading to eruption of
the Battles of al-Jamal, Siffin and al-Nahrawan, in which innocent people were
killed, how would wisemen be pleased then, with that rule which was put to test
and exorbitantly failed from the beginning, being a mischief for the Muslims.
This fact is more ascertained when knowing that those who believe in the
principle of shurā, elect the caliph having no authorization after that to
substitute or depose him. The Muslims tried their best to depose ‘Uthmān,
but he disdained, saying: "I never take off a garment Allah has clothed me
with."
That which increases even our aversion to this theory, being what is seen
nowadays in the civilized democracy-claiming Western countries, in regard of
electing the Head of State, with various parties struggling, bargaining and
competing for attaining to power at any cost, spending for this purpose
billions of money allocated for publicity in all its means. Further huge
potentials and resources being squandered on the cost of the oppressed among
the people who badly needing them. As soon as any of them assumes the headship,
sympathy overwhelms him, making him designate his supporters, party members,
friends and relatives in the posts of ministers, high-ranking responsibilities,
and significant positions in administration, leaving the others busy in the
activities of the opposition throughout his reign period, upon which it is
agreed too. In this way, they would create problems and obstacles for him,
doing their utmost to disgrace and topple him, entailing thus a heavy loss for
the downtrodden people. Consequently, many humane values were devoluted and
numerous Satanic depravitives were elevated with the titles of freedom and
democracy, and under bombastic slogans, in a way that sodomy was practised as a
lawful and legitimate act, and adultery turned to be a progress and advancement
as a substitute for marriage, about which you can say what you like.
How great the Shi‘ah’s belief in holding that successorship (khilāfah)
being one of principles of religion, and what sublime is their belief that this
post be according to the Will and choice of Allah, the Exalted. It is really on
apposite saying and sensible opinion, admitted by reason ('Aql) and with which
the conscience is pleased, being supported by texts from the Qur’ān and
(Prophetic) Sunnah, coercing the tyrants, dominants, kings and sovereigns,
imparting upon the society tranquillity and stability.
Notes:
[160]This incident reveals the presence of some of bedouins living outside
al-Madinah, who detest 'Ali ibn Abi Tālib and never like him, beside
disliking Muhammad (S). As a consequence we can notice how did this fool enter
upon the Prophet, and, without greeting him, called him: O Muhammad! He thus
proved to be among those meant in the Holy Qur'ānic verse: "The
(rustic) Arabs (of the desert) are very hard in infidelity and hypocrisy, and
more inclined not to know the limits of what Allah hath sent down unto His
Apostle ..." (9:97)
[161] Al-Hasakāni, Shawāhid al-tanzil, Vol. II, p. 286; Tafsir
al-Tha'labi, on the Surat al-Ma'ārij. Tafsir al-Qurtubi, Vol. XVIII, p.
278; Tafsir al-Manār, by Rashid Ridā, Vol. VI, p. 464; Yanābi'
al-mawaddah, by al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, p. 328; Al-Mustadrak 'alā
al-Sahihayn, by al-Hākim, Vol. II, p. 502; Al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah, Vol.
III, p. 275; Tadhkirat al-khawāss, by Ibn al-Jawzi, p. 37.
[162] Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari, Kitāb al-ma'ārif, p. 251.
[163] Al-'Imām Ahmad ibn Hanbal in his Musnad, Vol. I, p. 119.
[164] Al-Balādhuri in Ansāb al-'Ashrāf, Vols. I & II, p.
152.
[165] Ta'rikh Ibn 'Asākir, which is called Ta'rikh Dimashq, Vol. II, p. 7
and Vol. III, p. 150; — Sharh Nahj al-balāghah, of Ibn Abi al-Hadid,
verified by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl, Vol. XIX, p. 217; — 'Abaqāt
al-'anwār, Vol. II, p. 309; — Manāqib 'Ali ibn Abi Tālib, of Ibn
al-Maghāzili al-Shāfi'i, p. 23; — Al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah, Vol. III,
p. 337.
[166] The incident occurred on the Rahbah Day when al-'Imām 'Ali asked the
Sahābah to give witness about Hadith al-Ghadir. This incident is reported
by a large number of traditionists and historians, to whom a reference was made
previously, like Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ibn 'Asākir and Ibn Abi al-Hadid,
beside others.
[167]Ta'rikh Ibn 'Asākir al-Shafi'i, Vol. III, p. 5; Manāqib
al-Khwārazmi, p. 42; Yanābi' al-mawaddah, p. 79.
[168] Yanābi' al-mawaddah, Vol. II, p. 3, on the authority of al-Daylami,
Manāqib al-Khwārazmi and Dhakhā'ir al-'uqbā.
[169] The number was reported by al-Bukhāri and Muslim, while the number
and names were reported by the author of Yanābi' al-mawaddah, Vol. III, p.
99.